HealthScorer

One-Rep Max (1RM) Calculator

Estimate your 1RM from a sub-maximal lift using three peer-reviewed formulas. Includes a % of 1RM training intensity table.

Last updated: Sources verified:

What 1RM is and why estimate it

Your one-rep max (1RM) is the heaviest weight you can lift once with proper form. It’s the canonical measure of maximal strength for a given exercise. Programming intensity in resistance training is almost universally expressed as a percentage of 1RM — say, “5 sets of 5 at 80% 1RM.”

But you don’t usually want to test your 1RM. Testing carries injury risk, requires careful warm-up and spotters, and disrupts the training week. So we estimate it from a sub-maximal lift instead.

The three classic formulas

Epley (1985): 1RM = w × (1 + reps / 30)

Brzycki (1993): 1RM = w × 36 / (37 − reps)

Lombardi (1989): 1RM = w × reps^0.10

Where w is the weight lifted and reps is the number of full reps completed close to failure (RPE 9–10). These are all empirically derived regression equations — they learned the strength-endurance relationship from observed lifts.

When each formula performs best

FormulaBest atDrift
Brzycki2–10 repsUnderestimates at very low reps
Epley1–10 repsSlightly overestimates at high reps
Lombardi1–6 repsUnderestimates above 8 reps

For most everyday training the spread between them is 3–6%, which is below the noise of intra-session strength variation anyway. We display all three plus the average — if the spread is large (>10%), your reps were probably outside the formulas’ validation range and the estimate should be discarded.

How to take the input lift

  1. Warm up thoroughly: 2–3 ramping sets at 40–60% of an estimated 1RM.
  2. Pick a weight you can do for 3–8 reps with good form, ending close to failure.
  3. Complete the set with a stop on the last rep that’s clearly hard but not failed.
  4. Plug weight + reps into the calculator.

If you took the set to failure, count one less rep — true 1RM corresponds to a true RPE 10, but most people log RPE 8–9 even when they think they pushed hard.

% of 1RM training table (intensity zones)

Once you have an estimated 1RM, the calculator shows the load corresponding to standard training intensity zones (50% to 95%). Use them roughly as:

  • 50–60%: warm-up sets, technique work, deload weeks
  • 65–75%: hypertrophy work for 8–12 reps
  • 80–85%: strength work for 4–6 reps
  • 90–95%: max-effort doubles and singles

These are rules of thumb. Your individual reps-at-percentage profile is highly trainable and varies by exercise.

Pair with our other tools

When to retest

If you’re a beginner, retest every 4–6 weeks. Intermediate lifters, every 8–12 weeks. Advanced lifters, every 12+ weeks or after a deliberate peaking block. Don’t chase 1RM PRs at the expense of consistent training — long-term progression matters more than any single number.

Privacy

All calculation happens in your browser. We never see, log, or store the lifts you enter. Anonymous events (rep count) go to our privacy-first analytics.

Frequently asked questions

Which formula is most accurate?
Brzycki tends to be most accurate at 2–10 reps; Epley at 1–10 reps; Lombardi at 1–6 reps. Above 12 reps all three lose precision rapidly because muscular endurance — not strength — starts limiting the set. The calculator displays all three and an average so you can see the spread; if the spread is large (>10%) it means your reps were probably outside the formulas' validation range.
Should I actually test my 1RM?
For most recreational lifters: no, the estimate is enough. True 1RM testing carries injury risk and requires careful warm-up, spotters, and recovery. The estimate from a 5RM or 8RM tells you more than enough to program training intensity with the % of 1RM table.
How does the % of 1RM table relate to training?
Common training intensity zones: 50–60% for hypertrophy warmup or beginner work, 65–80% for hypertrophy main sets, 80–90% for strength, 90–95% for power. The exact percentages depend on goals and the rest of your programming. The table on this page gives you the loads to use; it doesn't prescribe rep ranges.
Why three formulas?
Each was derived from a different sample. Brzycki used college-aged men in classic lifts; Epley emerged from a sprint-football strength program; Lombardi came from a textbook covering general weight training. The average smooths out the noise of any single one. ACSM 2018 endorses both Epley and Brzycki for general use.
Does my data leave my device?
No. Calculation runs entirely in your browser. Inputs never reach our servers. Anonymous events (the rep count category) go to our privacy-first analytics.

Sources

  1. Strength testing: Predicting a 1-RM from a 4-6 RM (Epley) — Boyd Epley Workout (1985) (textbook, retrieved 2026-04-28)
  2. Strength testing: predicting a one-rep max from reps-to-fatigue — JOPERD (Brzycki, 1993) (peer reviewed, retrieved 2026-04-28)
  3. Beginning weight training: the safe and effective way (Lombardi) — Wm. C. Brown Publishers (Lombardi, 1989) (textbook, retrieved 2026-04-28)
  4. ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 11th edition — American College of Sports Medicine (guideline, retrieved 2026-04-28)